'Courtroom Workgroup Essay\r'

'The purpose of coquet is straight forward, to knead a conflict to justice. As simple as that sounds there are many more roles than a judge and a jury. Bringing a conflict to justice is a police squad effort, that team is know as a motor hotel charm group. angiotensin-converting enzyme of the major roles of this team is the prosecutor. The prosecutor is the attorney representing the conjure in one of the many trials on hand. With the uppity amounts of trials, the coquetroom has a process called twist justice funnel. This process helps minimize the amount of trials that are pending.\r\nThe court room work group is a team of individuals impact the trial. Several groups make up the courtroom work groups. The criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a juridic officer make up the most commonplace courtroom work group. Each individual has specific duties as part of the group. The judge is responsible for yield warrants towards a defendant, determining bail amount or if ba il is granted or denied, and presiding over trials. plea attorney are appointed to the defendant. These attorneys can be privately retained which can be costly. Prosecuting attorneys cognise as the prosecutors or District Attorneys represents the state in criminal cases. There are other work group members such as the law clerks, court clerks, administrators, jurors, witnesses, police officers, and on occasion the news media.\r\nThe criminal justice can be a ample everlasting process. To help speed up the processing of the increasing number of cases that rise every minute, a relationship forms in courtrooms between the main groups in the system, including the judge, defense counsel and prosecutor. The courtroom workgroup shows remarkable informative power in overburdened courts dealing with vast caseloads. I believe that there are legitimate changes that can be made to the\r\ncourtroom. Having higher security measures for more violent offenders should be taking into precaution . few jurors need to take into consideration the evidence that is be brought up upon them. I know of many cases that the defendant is declared guilty then later shew out they were innocent. There will also unendingly be the criminals let go because of a leave out of evidence to convince a jury.\r\n'