Gender Differences in Leadership Essay

1. What argon the strongest points of the makeup? What do you take away are its main contributions to the field of orbicular people care?The idea itself has a rattling interesting mapping with the research question of whether women leading are really different from men leaders. The report gives a really tidy introduction in particular giving the literature go over in order to get familiar with some basic friendship on the topic of gender differences in lead. The re fancy focus compounding of stereotypes and cultural differences stresses out swell a new viewpoint of the problem, which has non been discussed that widely in prior research. Also the introduction of the new purpose stereotype threat, which actually might be viewed as a partly solution for women sometimes performing not as well as they possibly could is an interesting point for management issues in reality. merely the strongest points of the wallpaper are evident. The introduction of the new concept of three paradigms gender-blind view, gender-conscious view and that perception creates reality are not only the strongest points of the paper, but in my opinion can also be considered as contributions to the field of global people management. This new paradigms could possibly change the perception of companies, maybe companies pass on use the tool of the three paradigms to analyse their own structures and be up to(p) to improve situations for women, giving them more possibilities.2. What are the weakest points of the paper? (E.g. What arguments are not strong enough? What is not clear? What is missing?)Potential drawbacks are that paradigms are introduced, but not sufficiently discussed within. Also the paper gives good examples where they can be found, it could show more proof for their existence unconnected from summarising and drawing them together from old unwrapings. Also the paper does not find a good way how to manage diversity and to capture it. It does not manage the comb ination of cost-effective coordination and senility to local cultures. Likewise the paper focuses on only twain firms, Fuel and Excel, which are really different in how they fill out the paradigms. In my opinion two firms are not enough, more firms should be surveyed for example in a questionnaire in order to give more support for the findings. Correspondingly the paper does not allow in a focus on multinational firms, which is in truth important not to leave out in times of globalization. The tolerate criticism is that the paper is unable to answer its paper purpose question what is the real difference between men and women in leadership.3. How could the author make the paper better?When writing the literature review the could build up the research papers and the gained knowledge chronologically and not going back and forth in the research dates. As the paper is missing some numbers, the technique of hypothesis could have been used, a larger number of companies questioned in survey style as then a quantitative analysis would exist as evidence for whether the problem exists in real life and whether paradigms can be implied in the general management world. Also the point of view of women on this topic would be very interesting and more expedient. How do women perceive the gender different initiatives, what would they kindred as support? Also the paper as already mentioned should include a focus on multinational firms and include those in a study.