Essay example --

Paternalism magic Stuart mill is wrong when it comes to his rejection of paternalism. mill about is taking a position that is in line with that of classical liberalism which in many a(prenominal) ship canal is in face-off to paternalism. This ideology only acknowledges the individual and does not take in trace the larger society. Many do not like to be told what is rightly when it deals with roundthing that does not affect anyone just themselves. The issue with this is that individuals atomic number 18 part of something. They ar part of a family, community, city and nation. The impact of those choices might be seen as insignificant and not have relevance outside of their own lives further it is a small picture view and forgets about the big picture. lounges is right that paternalism is taking away liberties but those liberties affect others in ways that a person might see. Society should act as a parent to its individuals because they could cause weakness or issues tha t go beyond the land of ones own household.According to the harm principle that Mills seems to be a supporter of, hard drug bans are justifiable because drug usage does effect more than just the user in many ways. Most drug bans are in response to some perceived negative that the lawmakers saw and wanted to prevent or stop. thither are times in history the reason for the ban was less(prenominal) than just but as a holistic perspective or so of the time the substances caused problems that had very negative effects on communities. Many times, the secure of the product comes from an illegitimate source. South American drug cartels and the Mexican cartels that many times transport the product across the border in the united States undermine the rule of law and public safety in those nations including the Unite... ... not fundamentally different when looking at the larger perspective from censor drugs like cocaine. Cocaine addiction and the other issues in this essay are all i ssues that different groups of people say should be individual liberties but have real impact negatively on the society approximately them. The issues of paternalism is that could be abused and made into tyrannical regime as Mill fears but there is a large difference from telling a motorcycle rider to wear a helmet to telling people they cannot component part political opinion. The argument is guilty of the slippery slope fallacy. As abundant the system has stated rights that cannot be infringed like the constitution does the in the get together States this that slide to tyranny should be prevented in a society that is root by the concept of rule of law. We do not just make it as individuals but also as parts of society.