Corporate Sponsored Education: The Limits Of Social Responsibility Essa

Corporate Sponsored Education The Limits Of genial Responsibility fleece The business sector increasingly subsidizes financially challenged institutions. Representative examples would include wellness care, major sports arenas, and penal facilities. Among the recent beneficiaries of corporate largesse are schools. such assistance blurs cordial roles and raises serious moral concerns, especially those of moral agency. Education, more than so than other social institutions, determines the kind of citizen and moral character a person can obtain. Put differently, education operates on virtue outgrowth that may override the fiscal logic of profit-maximization practiced by corporations. In this paper I reason that whatever benefit received by struggling schools is short-lived by comparison to the long range fascinate achieved by a corporation via advertisements that affect the psychological preferences of children. I shin that this makes the exchange unfair insofar as it violates the autonomy of the student. Education should appropriate a free and open atmosphere in which critical points of come across are discussed. If corporations are permitted untrammeled access to schools, social views may become one-dimensional. Economic salvation would effectively trade on the moral sorrow of schools. The familiar debate over corporate social responsibility draws against the guileless view of Milton Friedman that the sole responsibility of corporations is to its stockholders. This narrow view eschews corporate social responsibility for the maximization of profits whereby society would be the indirect beneficiary of market capitalism. In contrast, the broader view held by Richard DeGeorge, Tom Donaldson, and Norman Bowie argue that corporations have... ...Press, 1996) p. 12.(3) David Brewster. Weekly Washington, p. 6, 1997.(4) Alex Molnar, p. 66.(5) D. Stead. New York Times, January 5, 1997, p. 33.(6) John Kenneth Galbraith. The Dependence Effect, in Beauchamp and Bowie, p. 500.(7) Robert Arrington. Advertising and look Control. In Business Ethics, (Ed.) Thomas I. White. (New York Macmillan Publishing Co., 1993) p. 578.(8) See Henry Frankfurt. liberty of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Journal of Philosophy, LXVIII (1971), 5-20.(9) Richard L. Lippke. Advertising and the Social Conditions of Autonomy. In Thomas I. White, p. 586.(10) See Lynn Sharp Paine. Children as Consumers An Ethical military rank of Childrens Television Advertising. In Thomas I. White, p. 619.(11) Ibid., p. 622.(12) Ibid., p. 623.(13) P. Applebome. New York Times, March 16, 1997, p. E5.