Contributions to the Transformation of American Industry

It's as much as the thoughtful reader to determine on what basis Taylor's career and contributions needs to be assessed, and not a biased author. It is disingenuous with the author to argue that Taylor's contributions towards the development of market and management "had tiny direct effect on the character of factory jobs or the lot with the worker" (x). The capitalist procedure of the era of rapid industrialization where Taylor lived and worked was one which resulted in massive and egregious exploitation of workers. To say that a major figure in the advance of that industrialization and its management had small impact on the whole lot from the worker insults the intelligent reader.

Evaluating Taylor's contributions, then, is a matter of perspective. If the viewer comes during the perspective in the capitalist, the factory owner, the mechanical engineer or the scientific manager, Taylor's contributions are certain and helpful in streamlining industrialization, productivity and management methods. If, on a other hand, the viewer comes from the perspective on the worker, the human being at the center of capitalism and upon whom the entire industrial program depends for its existence, then Taylor's contributions needs to be referred to as into serious question. Even inside most objective factor of view, Taylor's work benefitted the rich and strong elite of industry a lot more than it benefitted the worker.

In any case, Taylor focused increasingly over a relationship in between mechanical improvements and efficient management. This focus inevitably led to centralized control with the factory operation, a system which increased the power and authority of management and weakened the worker's power to do anything to help himself:

Taylor's first encounter with workers as an "executive trainee" reveals his anti-worker priorities. Though Nelson downplays the significance from the encounter, the truth that Taylor "associated" it of the "beginning of scientific management" marks it like a critical thing in Taylor's development. In this incident, Taylor sought to increase the productivity in the machinists. Nelson's portrayal on the workers has them being a of lazy, disorganized, sneaky, disgruntled good deal resisting this sort of an output increase. Taylor fired some men, lowered others' wages, installed a piecework-based method notorious even now these days in sweatshops, and tried to institute a "fining program . . . to punish men who broke tools or spoiled work" (33-34). Taylor came out of this encounter not with any increased empathy for ones workers, but rather of the view that management was not strong or organized sufficient to institute whatever methods it deemed necessary to improve productivity and profit for ones factory owners. This encounter reflects Taylor's efforts and vision throughout his career.

The result was elevated management efficiency and elevated dehumanization of workers who have been much more and more regarded machine-like beings whose only value was measured in terms of units of output per hour. An crucial part of Taylor's ideas in this area was an attack over a power of the foreman, someone who was at least nominally aware with the workers as human beings.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!